|
Scourging or Whip Marks

There are dozens upon dozens of dumbbell shaped welts and contusions. The
patterns, shapes and size of the wounds are consistent with a Roman flagrum, a
whip of short leather thongs tipped with bits of lead, bronze or bone which tore
into flesh and muscle.
There is blood presumably from the flagellation and even a bit of tissue
thought by medical experts to be a torn-out bit of muscle.
From the angles of attack -- the way the marks fall on the man’s back,
buttocks,
and legs -- it seems that man was whipped by two men, one taller than the other
who stood on either side of the victim.
|
The
scientific study of the Turin shroud is like a microcosm of the
scientific search for God: it does more to inflame any debate than
settle it.”
And yet, the shroud is a remarkable artefact, one of the few religious
relics to have a justifiably mythical status.
It is
simply not known how the ghostly image of a serene, bearded man was
made.”
Scientist-Journalist Philip Ball
Nature, January 2005
Nature, that most prestigious of scientific journals, that once had
bragging rights to claim that the Shroud was fake, responding to new,
peer-reviewed studies that discredit the carbon 14 dating and show that
the Shroud could be authentic.
WHAT WE KNOW IN 2005
- The Shroud of Turin is certainly
much older than the now discredited radiocarbon date of 1260-1390.
It is at least twice as old and it could be 2000
years old.
FACTS
- Though no one knows how
it was made, the image is a selective caramel-like darkening of an otherwise
clear coating of starch fractions and various saccharides.
FACTS
- The blood is real blood.
FACTS
- Much of what we think we see in the
image is an optical illusion.
FACTS
Shroud of Turin Facts Check:
2005 Facts |