|
|
Much of what we see on the Shroud defies medieval sensibilities. The most
significant of these may be the nailing wounds to the wrists as opposed to the
palms of the hands. All medieval iconography showed Jesus nailed to the cross
through his palms. The wounds to the wrists, the nakedness of the body, the bloodstains around
the head, even the idea that a facial image would be on the Shroud and not
another cloth; all these things defy the sensibilities of Middle Ages artist or
forger of relics. |
The
scientific study of the Turin shroud is like a microcosm of the
scientific search for God: it does more to inflame any debate than
settle it.”
And yet, the shroud is a remarkable artefact, one of the few religious relics to have a justifiably mythical status. It is simply not known how the ghostly image of a serene, bearded man was made.”
Scientist-Journalist Philip Ball Nature, that most prestigious of scientific journals, that once had bragging rights to claim that the Shroud was fake, responding to new, peer-reviewed studies that discredit the carbon 14 dating and show that the Shroud could be authentic. WHAT WE KNOW IN 2005
|